Measured Checks
| Metric | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Main Content Length | PASS | 2318 visible main-content words; target 1,800–2,400. Header, footer, breadcrumb, sidebar and schema excluded. |
| Primary Base-Keyphrase Density | PASS | 46 occurrences ÷ 2272 compound-adjusted words × 100 = 2.025%. Target 2.0–2.5%. |
| Core Article Count | PASS | 2121 authored words; 46 base-phrase occurrences; 2.217% using the narrower core-copy count. |
| Primary Phrase in H1 | PASS | One H1, containing the exact primary keyphrase. Opening paragraph begins with the exact phrase. |
| Primary Phrase in Headings | PASS | 6 full-phrase headings including H1; five matching H2s. No introductory prose before the first H2. |
| Keyword-Related H2/H3 Headings | PASS | 17 of 17 (100.0%). Rule: contains Khula or a directly relevant family-law subject term listed below. |
| Frequently Asked Questions | PASS | 15 questions; answers range from 41 to 53 words. Native accessible details/summary accordions. |
| Two Unique WebP Images | PASS | Two distinct generated images, reserved for this sample page. Each shows family members and advocates. Illustrative captions; no fabricated named portraits. |
| Professional Legal Review | NOT VERIFIED | Sobia Mohsin and Mohsin Mirani are identified from owner-supplied practice roles. Neither is falsely credited with approving this draft. Their actual legal review remains pending. |
| Legal Sources and Provincial Currency | NOT VERIFIED | Federal statutes and an IHC jurisdiction decision inspected. Supreme Court official indexed extracts support the cited consent point; direct PDF retrieval returned 403. Punjab portal retrieval timed out. Full current territorial amendment and later-case sweep is incomplete. |
| Title, Description, Canonical and Breadcrumb | PASS | Unique title/description and self-referencing private-preview canonical. One H1. BreadcrumbList present. Existing indexed WordPress URL was not changed or redirected. |
| JSON-LD Parsing and FAQ Parity | PASS | JSON parsed locally; FAQ questions and answers compared with visible rendered copy. Result: True. LegalService, LocalBusiness, WebPage, Organisation, WebSite and BreadcrumbList are included. |
| External Structured-Data Validation | NOT VERIFIED | Google Rich Results Test and schema.org validator were not run. No Google FAQ rich-result eligibility or display is promised. |
| Desktop Browser QA | PASS | Desktop preview visually inspected. Both images loaded; FAQ expansion tested. One H1, correct preview canonical and no horizontal overflow at the tested 1348px viewport. This does not constitute a mobile test. |
| Mobile Viewport and Lighthouse | NOT VERIFIED | Responsive CSS implemented. Mobile browser screenshots and mobile/desktop Lighthouse scores have not been measured. No performance score is invented. |
| Internal Links and Image Files | PASS | All generated internal destination files and referenced image assets exist. Site-wide structural checker passes. |
| External Reference Accessibility | NOT VERIFIED | The service page links only two official references; its remaining statutory/judicial citations stay visible as text. This technical report retains the complete research list. The Supreme Court PDF was indexed but its direct retrieval returned 403; visitor access is not assumed. |
| Indexability and Sitemap | PASS | Private noindex review page; robots disallow. Sample deliberately excluded from the production sitemap until approved for indexing. |
| Updated Date | PASS | Updated on 27 October 2026 is visible near the bottom of the article. |
Keyword Counting Method
Rendered hero and article text, including headings, FAQs, source list, related links, captions, CTA and update note; excludes breadcrumb navigation and sidebar, as well as header/footer/schema.
Token rule: English letters and digits, with internal apostrophes and hyphens retained. Case-insensitive whole-phrase matching; each two-word “Khula Procedure” occurrence is counted as one unit in the compound denominator. Full exact primary phrase occurrences in core copy: 8.
Heading-related terms: Khula, Family Court, Haq Mehr, dower, custody, maintenance, guardianship, dissolution, Talaq and Family Lawyers. The 80% assessment is lexical under this disclosed rule; the owner should assess relevance and readability independently.
Complete Heading Structure
- H1: Khula Procedure in Pakistan
- H2: Khula Through Family Court: Rights, Documents and Legal Steps
- H2: Khula Procedure in Pakistan: Legal Overview
- H2: Khula, Talaq, Mubara’at and Faskh: Different Legal Routes
- H2: Khula Procedure in Pakistan and the Wife’s Consent
- H2: Khula Procedure in Pakistan: Required Documents
- H2: Khula Procedure in Pakistan: Filing and Jurisdiction
- H2: Khula Procedure Through Family Court: Notice and Reconciliation
- H2: Khula Procedure in Pakistan: Provincial Qualifications
- H2: Khula Decree and Post-Decree Procedures
- H2: Haq Mehr and Financial Rights in the Khula Procedure
- H2: Khula for Overseas Pakistanis
- H2: Child Custody, Maintenance and Guardianship after Khula
- H2: Khula Lawyers in Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad and Rawalpindi
- H2: Experienced Family Lawyers and Khula Guidance
- H2: Frequently Asked Questions about the Khula Procedure
- H2: Khula Law: Statutory and Judicial References
- H2: Related Khula, Maintenance and Custody Guidance
Statutory and Judicial Source List
- Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 — Sections 2 and 5
- Family Courts Act, 1964 — Pakistan Code consolidation; check territorial amendments
- Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 — Sections 7 and 8
- Ibrahim Khan v Mst. Saima Khan — Supreme Court, C.P. 4657–4659/2022, 15 February 2024
- Islamabad High Court, W.P. 5459/2025 — Rule 6 and jurisdiction discussion; cites Sohail Ahmed v Mst. Samreena Rasheed Memon (2024 SCMR 634)
Review the Complete Article
General guidance. The applicable law, local amendments and case record must be checked for your matter.

